Common Failures and Criticisms of Hypnotherapy
Hypnotherapy often comes up for criticism. The following article presents a few of them, along with a balanced look at how seriously we should take them.
Guilt by Association
Due to the nature of hypnotherapy (for further explanation see related articles) and due to its early links with mysticism and spirituality, it is often criticised and discredited by people on the grounds that there is no basis in fact to presume that it is an effective means if curing ailments. To refute this argument it is worth considering that scientific medicine has a history characterized by dubious medical practices such as ‘bleeding’ (where patients had their body pierced and blood drained to let out the illness), to name one among many other equally grim and ineffective practices. Many of these treatments were based on poor science, some, it seems, upon gut instinct.Prior to this, all medicine and healing finds its common ancestor in magic ritual and mystical healing practices. It is true to say that hypnotherapy has something in common with some of these practices – the repetition of phrases over and over to calm the patient, for example. Yet this does not necessarily disprove hypnotherapy’s effectiveness as a healing method; rather it may suggest that some early magic and mystical practices were indeed as successful as many of our contemporary medical treatments! Anxiety, for example, may be treated by the hypnotherapist in much the same way as a mystic, working within an ancient tradition, would still treat it - by calming the mind through using breathing techniques and positive affirmation.
Difficulty in Testing Results
Hypnotherapy is a form of healing subject to much skepticism in the medical and scientific professions. Whilst it can often be clearly ascertained that a course of hypnotherapy can coincide with the improvement of a patient’s medical condition, it is not easy to draw a direct correlation between that improvement and the process of hypnotherapy itself. This is partly because there are few visible or extreme changes to metabolism during hypnotherapy.Further to this, patients react very differently from one another and so a representative sample may not be all that representative at all! In contrast to well trusted treatments, like Paracetamol for cold symptoms, hypnotherapy dos not to a similar degree across the majority of the population. Thus makes it difficult to ascertain of those who react well to hypnotherapy may have simply have had a natural propensity to recover from the ailment that they were treated for.
All in the Mind
Many tests show that hypnotherapy may help to a given patients condition in conjunction with Western medicine on a purely psychosomatic basis – that is to say that a patient has a positive mental response to treatment, but that this has little to do with the treatment itself.However, this need not be a criticism at all, as, in contrast to drugs like Prozac, which are said to be completely ineffective apart from their psychosomatic benefits, hypnotherapy is precisely intent on producing these benefits, The hypnotherapist aims to heal the patient by suggesting to their subconscious mind that they are capable of healing themselves. Therefore any suggestion that ‘it’s all in the mind’ shows a clear misunderstanding of what is at stake. Unfortunately this is a by product left over from Western medicine's outdated and lingering propensity to suppose that all treatments must act on the physical body, whereas New Age Medicine and Eastern methods understand the duality of body and mind.
